<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avatar nice but not enough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hollywoodinhidef.com/2010/01/cameron-give-me-real-3d-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hollywoodinhidef.com/2010/01/cameron-give-me-real-3d-experience/</link>
	<description>Blu-ray, high definition, 3D news from Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://hollywoodinhidef.com/2010/01/cameron-give-me-real-3d-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-1904</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollywoodinhidef.com/?p=927#comment-1904</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott,

I too want the satisfaction of having to refocus in and out of the window, but if I come across a scene that lacks pop, it&#039;s not the cameras that need to be set further apart- it&#039;s that content creators just need to add something, anything, into the foreground. For instance, if you&#039;re looking out the window of an airplane, you&#039;d want a wing or propeller or something in sight with the clouds, earth and water mostly looking flat. 3D works best within a 15-20 foot radius in real life.

I think 2D&gt;3D will be similar to SD&gt;HD: there will be those who complain that the difference isn&#039;t big enough, and then there will be temptation for the cinematographers to use wider lens spacing at the cost of criticism from the enthusiasts who will say it doesn&#039;t look natural anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott,</p>
<p>I too want the satisfaction of having to refocus in and out of the window, but if I come across a scene that lacks pop, it&#8217;s not the cameras that need to be set further apart- it&#8217;s that content creators just need to add something, anything, into the foreground. For instance, if you&#8217;re looking out the window of an airplane, you&#8217;d want a wing or propeller or something in sight with the clouds, earth and water mostly looking flat. 3D works best within a 15-20 foot radius in real life.</p>
<p>I think 2D&gt;3D will be similar to SD&gt;HD: there will be those who complain that the difference isn&#8217;t big enough, and then there will be temptation for the cinematographers to use wider lens spacing at the cost of criticism from the enthusiasts who will say it doesn&#8217;t look natural anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

